Google and SmartCJ

happydg
Posts: 412
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 2:22 pm

Re: Google and SmartCJ

Post by happydg »

One of my site has also been banned recently by google it's a free version.

They say it's a quality problem. The site has embeds of xhamster, redtube etc...

I tried to get it unbanned but they don't want to. There is still the quality issue even with very high skim.

Someone has an idea how to get unbanned?
darkfarrow
Posts: 56
Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2013 11:38 am

Re: Google and SmartCJ

Post by darkfarrow »

happydg wrote:One of my site has also been banned recently by google it's a free version.

They say it's a quality problem. The site has embeds of xhamster, redtube etc...

I tried to get it unbanned but they don't want to. There is still the quality issue even with very high skim.

Someone has an idea how to get unbanned?
change domain + buy pro license considering the pro license sites didnt get banned and they all too have the same embed ways
tubeman
Posts: 534
Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2013 11:33 am

Re: Google and SmartCJ

Post by tubeman »

Thanks for the info darkfarrow, then I feel whats happening is that google is going after sites with this in their html code :

<!--This page was generated by SmartCJ : free version -->

Because everyone using the Free version have this in their html code.I don't see any other difference on the front pages.If you happen to find any other observation please let us know.
darkfarrow
Posts: 56
Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2013 11:38 am

Re: Google and SmartCJ

Post by darkfarrow »

tubeman wrote:Thanks for the info darkfarrow, then I feel whats happening is that google is going after sites with this in their html code :

<!--This page was generated by SmartCJ : free version -->

Because everyone using the Free version have this in their html code.I don't see any other difference on the front pages.If you happen to find any other observation please let us know.
Could very well be
happydg
Posts: 412
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 2:22 pm

Re: Google and SmartCJ

Post by happydg »

darkfarrow wrote:
happydg wrote:One of my site has also been banned recently by google it's a free version.

They say it's a quality problem. The site has embeds of xhamster, redtube etc...

I tried to get it unbanned but they don't want to. There is still the quality issue even with very high skim.

Someone has an idea how to get unbanned?
change domain + buy pro license considering the pro license sites didnt get banned and they all too have the same embed ways
So it took many months to get google traffic and i have to restart to zero?
tubeman
Posts: 534
Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2013 11:33 am

Re: Google and SmartCJ

Post by tubeman »

happydg, I have 18 sites that have got banned by google and yes once banned google will not bring a site back for a very longtime, perhaps many months.
Ramp
Posts: 135
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 11:23 am

Re: Google and SmartCJ

Post by Ramp »

maybe it didn't like the word GENERATED. Sounds like all the sites are autogenerated :)
darkfarrow
Posts: 56
Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2013 11:38 am

Re: Google and SmartCJ

Post by darkfarrow »

happydg wrote:
darkfarrow wrote:
happydg wrote:One of my site has also been banned recently by google it's a free version.

They say it's a quality problem. The site has embeds of xhamster, redtube etc...

I tried to get it unbanned but they don't want to. There is still the quality issue even with very high skim.

Someone has an idea how to get unbanned?
change domain + buy pro license considering the pro license sites didnt get banned and they all too have the same embed ways
So it took many months to get google traffic and i have to restart to zero?
yup, google is evil -- that's what corporate greed and pleasing shareholders will do to a company that starts off with do no evil...
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 37994
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:43 am

Re: Google and SmartCJ

Post by admin »

Yes, that 'generated ' string was removed 3 days ago.
Don't forget to run script update
tubeman
Posts: 534
Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2013 11:33 am

Re: Google and SmartCJ

Post by tubeman »

Do we need to update the script to the latest build get that tag removed?
Post Reply